Skip to content

Results Over Activity Metrics

Paperwork Team 2 min read

You can move tickets around. You can inflate story points. You can close items that should still be open. You can adjust the burndown chart. You can write status updates that make everything sound on track.

You can fake every metric in your project management tool.

You can't fake results.

The Metric Problem

When you measure people on activity — tickets closed, story points completed, velocity maintained — you get optimized activity. People close tickets faster. They split work into smaller tickets to increase the count. They estimate higher so velocity looks good. They game the system because the system rewards gaming.

None of this produces better outcomes. The product doesn't improve. The customers aren't happier. The business doesn't grow. But the dashboard looks great.

Accountability Without Surveillance

Real accountability is simple: are things being shipped? Are you getting the outcomes you want? Is the product getting better? Are customers satisfied?

These are hard questions. They don't fit neatly into a dashboard. They require judgment to assess. They require actually knowing what the team is building and why.

That's the point. Accountability should require engagement, not just monitoring. A manager who knows the team's work can assess quality without counting tickets. A manager who only counts tickets is measuring the wrong thing.

Results Over Activity

Believe it or not, people are adults who can often work unsupervised. If they can't, you have a hiring problem, not a process problem.

Stop measuring activity. Start measuring outcomes. The teams that ship real value don't have the best dashboards — they have the best products. And that's the only metric that matters.

Share if it was useful

If this resonates, try the workflow in Paperwork.

Request Access